#FILMUL STAPANUL INELELOR 1 TRIAL#

And this also explains why Jackson chose the actors he did for their roles: they are not `big' names - no `Sean Connery', no `Alan Rickman', no `Brad Pitt', no `Sam Neill'etc. Or is he now going to add the theme of the great contest of good versus evil to the unfolding reading? All of this points to the fact that the film, even though it is a feast of special effects, focuses on character. He has lived up to our expectation by creating even bigger ones: how can he handle the story of the chase andrescue of Merry and Pippin, the storming of Isengard etc - stories which don't really add much to the core theme that is emerging.

#FILMUL STAPANUL INELELOR 1 TRIAL#

In a sense, Jackson's real trial - as far as those who know the books are concerned - will come with the second film in the series. It is a miracle of this reading of the first volume of the book that one can see where Jackson is going and one can get a feel of how the reading is going to unfold. Bombadil, like the Balrog, is beyond the ring but the latter is important to the unfolding of the story of the fates of all the characters, Bombadil isn't. I can see why, in this reading, Jackson decided to leave out the Bombadil episode. Clearly those most tempted by it are mortal men (Boromir and even, in one moment, Aragorn), those who already have power (Elrond - `The ring cannot stay here' Galadriel Gandalf and Saruman), and, of course, those who would not normally desire it but who by accident become ring bearers - Gollum, Bilbo, Frodo. He focuses on the corrupting influence of the ring and, through this focus, the character of the chief protagonists of the story are revealed. It is the kind of experience that makes you want to go back and reread the whole thing in the light of the emphases that Jackson has brought to the story. It is not the book but a reading of the book which is inventive and fascinating. I have just seen the first `volume' and can say without hesitation that he has succeeded in both his goals. The book itself is `HUGE': this was not going to be the kind of task that the James Ivory team set themselves, or Scorsese nor the kind of task facing Branagh with Hamlet nor was it going to be like the puny task that faced Columbus with `Harry Potter' who had the bigger budget ($130 million for one film as compared with Peter Jackson with $300m for three).

In the latter task he was certainly not helped by the author or the book: Tolkein, it would seem, hated cinema. In doing this he, of course, set himself an enormous challenge: he had to make a really good `fantasy' film, one which would stand on its own and be true to what he had originally wanted to do but he would also, and here the task he had set himself was enormous, be true to the original book and to make a film which the legions of people who have loved this book would feel happy with. After repeating that phrase on a number of occasions the question popped into his mind: 'Well, why not the `The Lord of the Rings' itself?'. I think it is important to remember that Peter Jackson took up this film not in order just to make a film of `The Lord of the Rings' but because he wanted to make a 'fantasy just like the `The Lord of the Rings'' as he himself put it.

Filmul stapanul inelelor 1